Two online magazines, a very extensive helpdesk: these were the first steps at Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences to facilitate teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic. What is now abundantly clear: you teach as a team. “The teacher is about the content, but is supported in this by others.”
Judith Vennix is the project manager of theeducational learning technology workshop at the Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences. The workshop consists of people who stimulate digitalisation, IT, and educational technology within the university of applied sciences by conducting experiments in education. “For two years now, we have been saying education gets better when you also use modern educational learning technology. Students work a lot with technology. With phone, apps, with the internet. Education is part of society, so we can’t lag behind. That doesn’t mean you should throw out all forms of education. Not at all. But you do have to adapt a bit.”
And exactly that happened – albeit by necessity – during the pandemic. A crisis management team, drawn up by the board, set out the broad outlines in the institution. The interpretation was left to the professionals. The workshop quickly produced an online magazine about distance education. This was followed by a magazine about remote testing. “It took longer because you have to deal with laws and regulations,” Judith recalls. The assessment of students’ work also turned out to be more complex: “Suppose you give a student a 6.3, what is that three-tenths based on if you can no longer test in the normal way?”
The first bumps in practice became visible. Teachers who wanted to teach online, but did not know-how. “We saw that overall digital literacy had to be worked on. That is precisely what is necessary if you are going to redesign your teaching and must deploy resources to be able to teach in an active manner.” And what to do with the different dilemmas in online teaching? “In the classroom, a teacher can ask any student a question. Online this is more difficult when students have turned off their camera. You don’t even know if they are there, so you have to find other ways to get interaction during a session.”
More IT coaches
In order to provide teachers with the best possible support, the helpdesk was supplemented by teachers with a great deal of experience with educational learning technology. People from the IT department also participated. Teachers were able to email questions, after which the team members offered assistance byphone. Webinars were also held. Ultimately, it turned out the magazines were used much more than the helpdesk was called upon. “I think people still had the idea the helpdesk was focused on technical problems. We had explicitly said to also also contact the helpdes with educational questions. We’ll communicate this better this year, as we want to continue to use the combination of technical and digital support.” This also translates into the deployment of more IT and education coaches. One coach was already active, now there are three. “ The question from education is relevant and urgent: “Now that we have the resources, how are we going to integrate them nicely into our education?”
The regular professional development offers for teachers has been shaken up considerably by the COVID-19 crisis, Judith sees. Why choose yet another course, when there are many more options? “Think of learning communities, for example. Or what you want to achieve as a team, instead of just looking at the individual wishes of a teacher.” A small revolution, she thinks. “It’s become much clearer that the teacher is still about the content, but the form can be very well supported by other people. For example, people who can make good knowledge clips or can advise on how to prepare a good formative assessment.”
Measure digital literacy
In the workshop, Judith’s team is working on a tool teachers can use to measure their digital literacy themselves. “This then produces advice, so lecturers know what they can work on. And then we want to see whether we can offer guidance via ICTO coaches, a course, or learning communities. Put colleagues with the same learning questions together and they can start acquiring knowledge themselves.”
These will be permanent elements in the further professional development for teachers. Because it remains necessary, she says. We have now gained so much new knowledge and experience. You don’t just let go of them. “I don’t see a lecture with 500 people on location happening anytime soon. We know splitting this up into knowledge clips in combination with (online) group counselling works much better and als a result, fewer students drop out. The world of educational technology never stands still, so it’s important to keep studying it.”
Interview: Hester Otter
This is part 2 in a series of a total of 6 interviews with participants in the Professional development zone. In the interviews, they share practical experience and inspiration for supporting teachers in educational innovation with ICT.
Kick-off: introduction and teams start
From the SURF studio, presenters Egbert Neels (Proeftuinen Proeftuinen of the Lecturer Professionalization zone) and Myrna van de Water (Program Manager AI & Ethics and Samen Duurzaam at Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences) told what the teams had to develop over the next 24 hours, with the assignment: “We know that student motivation is influenced by the elements of autonomy, social belonging and competence. Think of an AI application that positively influences (one of) these elements within your educational context.” To do this, the teams had to develop a number of components. To be precise: a proof-of-concept, background information on the properties of the AI solution and a reflection on inclusiveness and ethical considerations.
Time to get started. But not before they have learned three more lessons from professor and jury member Kim Schildkamp (University of Twente):
Don’t get lost in all the data. Start with a clear goal and target audience
Pay attention to the quality of data
Think about the degree of control
“We continued through the night finalizing the plan and developing wireframes.” – Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences team
Interim evaluations and night work
After the kick-off, the teams got to work. And that with the help of Jedis: experts who can take your team’s idea to the next level In the meantime, there were regular evaluations, and Egbert rightly remarked: “AI is not for everyone”. This became apparent when people dropped out in teams here and there. Still, many participants continued steadily. Some well into the night, and got up early in the morning for the final round-ups and presentations. Before giving the presentations, the last tips were given about, among other things, ethical considerations surrounding the AI solutions.
“I am very curious how you will look at evidence-informed: how can we ensure that we stay away from the biases.” – Nico Boot, leader zone Evidence-informed educational innovation with ICT
Presentations: surprising AI applications
The teams came up with surprising AI applications. Think of linking apps that measure stress indicators (team Hogeschool Rotterdam, Physiotherapy course) and Questinder – an application to link students with questions about certain professional products in a regional to global network (team Avans Hogeschool). The teams were judged by jury members Kim Schildkamp (University of Twente), Inge Molenaar (Radboud University) and Rob van der Willigen (Hogeschool Rotterdam). Ultimately, the winner was the Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences team. The participants were allowed to present their solution on June 29 at the Dutch AI Coalition.
Month of AI in Education
Do you want to know more about AI or are you curious about the other activities of the Month of AI in education?
The Hackathon AI is part of the testing grounds of the Teacher Professionalization zone. The Artificial Intelligence Testing Ground will be published shortly as a result of this hackathon. Keep an eye on our website and/or follow us on LinkedInor Twitter!
“Look for people within the organisation with a lot of knowledge and ideas about educational development. Bring them into contact with each other, for example in a collaboration environment or on the intranet, so they can share their ideas. This in turn inspires other colleagues to do even more with educational development. And the organisation is reaping the benefits.”
Share this page
De volgende projecten, publicaties en producten vind je wellicht ook interessant.